![]() It is an example for a good software that unfortunately fails in delivering totally expected very basic function and makes it very hard to try it a second time because the "very basic" category does not work as expected. This behavior can be configured in nomacs too.Ĭan confirm that first experience of nomacs made me conclude "not usable" because of not finding a way to pan the picture neither by keyboard or by mouse and not finding any hint about keyboard shortcuts and no way to configure these absolutely basic functions. ) use the mouse wheel for switching between images. Most image viewers I know (including IrfanView, Windows Photo Viewer. However for image viewers this is not the case (the mouse wheel would do nothing if the image fits the window). to scroll using the mouse wheel since their content is mostly vertical. The thing here is, that it makes sense for text editors etc. Let's call it mouse wheel : ) - Take a look at Google Maps - it has a pretty similar zoom/pan behavior as nomacs and is used by a lot of users.Ĭonform with the universal conventions on mouse wheel bindings listed above, and That's why it's called a scroll wheel not a zoom wheel -) For example placing the back button at the top left corner is extremely common - still it's not a good practice since this corner is hard to reach.Īlmost all users will expect the scroll wheel to scroll, not zoom. ![]() When thinking about user experience extremely common is not what you want in general. ![]() Hi think what users expect is heavily depending on the OS they are using (nomacs tries to bridge that). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |